Category Country Intelligences

The New Power Geometry

For fifty years, the story told about emerging economies was simple: they have the resources, the established world has the capital and the technology, and the arrangement benefits everyone — except, quietly, the countries at the bottom. That arrangement is being renegotiated. Not through revolution. Not through confrontation. Through the slow, structural decision of Indonesia, India, Vietnam, and Malaysia to stop selling their wealth at raw material prices and start capturing the value that the layer above it generates.

Vol. 17 maps the geometry of this renegotiation — the three things emerging economies need (financing from Singapore, market access from the United States, industrial technology from China), why each node is irreplaceable and non-substitutable, and why a more prosperous emerging economy base is not a threat to the established order but the mechanism by which it grows. The pie is not being divided. The circulation is upgrading. And almost nobody is reading it correctly.

Indonesia Banking sector, The Transition Tax

TGS has maintained an underweight position on Indonesian banks since 2024. Not because the banks are badly managed. Because we read the policy direction before it appeared in financial statements — and what we read told us that the government was deliberately deploying the Himbara banks as a policy instrument, creating a structural Transition Tax on bank profitability that the valuation screens could not see. The data has confirmed this quarter by quarter: Himbara collective profit growth went from +22.86% in 2023 to -11.26% in Q1 2025. This is Phase 1. Phase 2 — when provisions overwhelm the buffer and net profit falls sharply — is incoming. Vol. 17 maps the mechanism, the historical parallel, the P&L forensics, and the six leading indicators that will signal the reversal before it ever appears in a quarterly report. Full article available to subscribers.

The Seat doesn’t wait..

The seat being vacated by domestic capital fleeing to Dubai and Singapore is not staying empty. Someone else is sitting in it — and that someone is not Indonesian.

Bloomberg documented it. One advisory firm alone moved $50 million of Indonesian client money to the Gulf in a single quarter — up from $10 million the prior quarter. In the same period, China-Hong Kong became Indonesia's largest investor at $4.9 billion in Q1 2026 alone.

The fear is understandable. The response is not.

This Intelligence Brief maps five specific fears driving domestic capital flight — and tests each one against data. It then offers what the government has not: a clear framework for what to do, in what sequence, before the window closes.

Kursi itu tidak menunggu.

Come Now or Never

Nobody said it with those exact words. That is the point.

When a Finance Minister flies to New York and tells BlackRock, HSBC, and Lazard that their concerns about Indonesia's fiscal direction are "noise" — he is not making a pitch. He is setting a condition.

When a President stands before parliament and says of his country's largest export commodity: "If they do not want to buy, then we will use our palm oil ourselves" — he is not making a threat. He is informing the market of a structural change that is already underway.

UN Comtrade data shows a $908 billion gap between what Indonesia reported as commodity exports and what trading partners reported as imports — accumulated over 34 years. Indonesia is now building the instrument to close it. The window for entering as a partner is specific, verifiable, and closing.

This is not a sales pitch. It is a closing window.

The Selection Engine

Indonesia's nickel production has grown 158% since 2019. Its tax-to-GDP ratio has declined over the same period. These two facts cannot coexist in a functioning value capture model.

In Vol. 14 — The Selection Engine, we examine three intersecting policy developments: Danantara's resource consolidation, the enforcement mechanism behind Permenkum 49/2025, and the aggregate effect of five simultaneous policy shifts on Indonesia's competitive landscape.

Taken separately, each has a legitimate institutional rationale. Taken together, they describe something more deliberate — a selection engine that determines which economic actors survive, which are absorbed, and which are allowed to atrophy without direct intervention.

The filter does not announce itself. It operates through compliance calendars, notarization fees, and budget line items. The outcome is visible in the data. The mechanism is visible in the design.

The question for capital is not whether the filter is intentional. The question is what it selects for — and whether that selection aligns with or contradicts Indonesia's stated development objectives.

The Contrarian Trade

The Market panicked. the Farmers paid. Somewhere in between, a window opened that almost nobody saw.

Something happened in Indonesia's palm oil market in the week of 20 May 2026 that the headlines got completely wrong.

The Story being told was about farmers in distress. TBS prices collapsing. Petani menjerit. A government policy causing chaos.

That stiry is true. But it is not the whole picture.

The Part nobody wrote about is what that collapse created - and for whom.

This brief contains specific data, a verified historical precedent, three confirmed catalyst with dates, and a scenario analysis we are not comfortable publishing openly.

Who was actually Bought?

In 2020, as pandemic shuttered classroom accross Indonesia, The Ministry of Education announced a nearly IDR 10 trillion digitalization program. The stated goal: ensure millions of students could keep learning. The device chosen was the Chromebook.
What was not in that official narrative was what happened before - and to whom the money actually flowed.
The court-confirmed state loss is IDR 5,26 trillion. That number has a source. But there is one figure that never appears in any prosecutor's brief, BPKP audit, or media report: the value of the data and ecosystem access acquired from this transaction.
The Classroom was the market. The students were the users. The state paid the acquisition cost.

The Royalty Doctrine. How Indonesia is pricing China out of Its own game.

Jakarta did not raise royalty rates. It deployed a fiscal instrument disguised as tax policy — one that structurally dismantles China's price-control architecture across nickel, bauxite, tin, cobalt, and beyond. Chinese firms control 75% of Indonesia's nickel refining. Cobalt has been extracted for a decade at zero royalty. The HMA mechanism neutralises transfer pricing entirely. Vol. 08 maps the full ownership structure, the extraction playbook, and the five design requirements for Indonesia to execute this correctly. The endgame is not revenue. It is sovereignty.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Powered by